Survivor: Cook Islands - Aired Dec. 7 - Commentary
Idiots.
To quote my very first paragraph from last week, "Okay, Aitu, don't do anything stupid. Candice is gone and that's a good thing. Messing with the plan now would be a bad thing. Is Jonathan annoying and untrustworthy? Sure. But voting someone off because they're annoying is always one of the stupidest things tribes on this show ever do, and if you know someone is untrustworthy, you an use them."
Is Jonathan not trustworthy? Of course not. Was the treatment he received this week pathetic? Yes. Holy crap, they could barely bring themselves to talk to him. "Oooooh, camp is ever so much funner without Jonathan around!" Thanks to the treatment Aitu gave him, and this really stupid vote, I no longer care who wins. Aitu just gave Raro the opening they needed to really start to work people and try to turn them. If Adam or Parvartie (again, I have no idea how to spell her name) aren't voted off next week, you can give the game to them.
I really did want to see an alliance go all the way to the final four without fracturing, but getting rid of Jonathan is the first crack. Is he really that unbearable that he can't be tolerated for a few more days for the sake of a million dollars?
Not only that, Aitu let Raro and their hypocritical distaste for the man influence them. So they're a lot more fun without him around. You're voting them off anyway!
And yes, they are really, very hypocritical. The only difference between him and Candice is that he realized he made a mistake and changed his mind. She turned on her tribe without even blinking.
It gets even worse. Adam has won an immunity, and Proovity just won a reward challenge after nearly severing part of her finger. That makes them dangerous! WHY OH WHY ARE YOU NOT VOTING THEM OFF WHEN YOU HAVE THE CHANCE?!?!?!
Idiots.
To quote my very first paragraph from last week, "Okay, Aitu, don't do anything stupid. Candice is gone and that's a good thing. Messing with the plan now would be a bad thing. Is Jonathan annoying and untrustworthy? Sure. But voting someone off because they're annoying is always one of the stupidest things tribes on this show ever do, and if you know someone is untrustworthy, you an use them."
Is Jonathan not trustworthy? Of course not. Was the treatment he received this week pathetic? Yes. Holy crap, they could barely bring themselves to talk to him. "Oooooh, camp is ever so much funner without Jonathan around!" Thanks to the treatment Aitu gave him, and this really stupid vote, I no longer care who wins. Aitu just gave Raro the opening they needed to really start to work people and try to turn them. If Adam or Parvartie (again, I have no idea how to spell her name) aren't voted off next week, you can give the game to them.
I really did want to see an alliance go all the way to the final four without fracturing, but getting rid of Jonathan is the first crack. Is he really that unbearable that he can't be tolerated for a few more days for the sake of a million dollars?
Not only that, Aitu let Raro and their hypocritical distaste for the man influence them. So they're a lot more fun without him around. You're voting them off anyway!
And yes, they are really, very hypocritical. The only difference between him and Candice is that he realized he made a mistake and changed his mind. She turned on her tribe without even blinking.
It gets even worse. Adam has won an immunity, and Proovity just won a reward challenge after nearly severing part of her finger. That makes them dangerous! WHY OH WHY ARE YOU NOT VOTING THEM OFF WHEN YOU HAVE THE CHANCE?!?!?!
Idiots.
Labels: CBS, commentary, Survivor: Cook Islands
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home